Avadhut Sathe Case: How a Finfluencer’s Rise Exposed SEBI’s Grey Zone?

Synopsis: A popular stock market trainer with a large online following is under SEBI’s scanner for giving unregistered investment advice through paid courses. The case shows how flashy marketing, bold claims, and blurred lines between education and tips can mislead retail investors and expose gaps in India’s market regulation.

A smooth-talking market educator, a fast-growing army of retail followers, and hundreds of crores changing hands through “training” programmes have now drawn the attention of India’s market watchdog, raising uncomfortable questions about where financial education ends and unregulated investment advice begins?

Wolf Meets The Watch Dog 

The film The Wolf of Wall Street follows the rise of Jordan Belfort, a smooth-talking trader who built his empire by pulling everyday people into the stock market, many of whom barely understood how it worked. He got them to push questionable stocks on unsuspecting investors, but his real strength wasn’t market knowledge. It was his ability to sell a dream. Belfort wrapped himself in confidence, promised unimaginable riches, and slowly turned belief into blind loyalty. Eventually, the illusion fell apart, and he landed in prison for manipulation and mis-selling.

India has had its own share of such market characters, from Harshad Mehta to Ketan Parekh, which is why regulators remain wary of individuals who display outsized influence over retail investors. That same scrutiny has now shifted to Avadhut Sathe, a self-proclaimed market professional who ran stock market training programmes. Over time, Sathe built a fiercely loyal following, with many participants claiming his courses transformed their financial lives. While this case does not involve the kind of outright stock rigging seen in past scandals, the familiar pattern lies in the personality-first ecosystem that formed around him.

In investing, grand promises, high-energy spectacles, and almost devotional fanbases are usually warning signs. Markets are unpredictable by nature, and even the most seasoned investors admit there is no guaranteed, foolproof way to make money consistently. Yet, much like godmen offering miracles, Sathe appeared to package certainty in a game defined by risk. 

Earlier this year, SEBI stepped in, taking action against Avadhut Sathe and his wife, Gouri Sathe, who are directors of Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy, and carried out raids at their premises. Beyond the specifics of the case, it serves as a broader reminder of how easily confidence can be mistaken for credibility in the stock market.

What Went Wrong? 

At its core, the issue with Avadhut Sathe’s operation was straightforward but serious: he was not registered with SEBI. In India, anyone offering investment advice or publishing formal equity research must be registered with the regulator. The process itself isn’t prohibitive. It requires meeting certain educational criteria, clearing a NISM examination, and having a minimum level of relevant work experience. But registration is not just a formality. 

Once registered, an advisor becomes part of the regulated ecosystem of India’s capital markets, where words carry weight and influence retail decision-making. That comes with strict responsibilities, including an obligation not to mislead investors or use unofficial channels to dispense stock advice.

SEBI places clear boundaries on what registered investment advisers and research analysts can and cannot do. They are prohibited from running WhatsApp or Telegram stock-tip groups, guaranteeing returns of any kind, or selectively advertising success stories to lure investors. 

While selling educational courses is allowed, these courses must remain strictly educational and cannot be mixed with specific stock recommendations or live trading guidance. According to SEBI’s findings, Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy crossed nearly every one of these lines. In fact, SEBI’s order suggests that operating outside the regulatory framework was not incidental, but central to how the business functioned.

At the heart of ASTA’s operations was an elaborate, multi-tier course structure, marketed with flashy and often dramatic names. Entry-level offerings included introductory sessions such as the “Eye Opener” webinar or market orientation programme, priced at Rs. 500. The flagship programme, GEO or “Get Edge Over Others”, bundled multiple modules including SMM (Secrets of Market Millionaires), PAPA (Pay Attention to Price Action), FOME (Futures Options Made Easy), and GUE (Get Ultimate Edge), collectively priced at Rs. 72,000. Beyond this were advanced programmes like GEO Panoramic at Rs. 6,000, GEO Plus at Rs. 1,70,000, and a Special Mentorship Programme that cost as much as Rs. 6,75,000. Guided journey programmes such as Aarambh at Rs. 18,000 and Samanvay at Rs. 90,000 further added to the layered pricing structure.

What ultimately brought regulatory action was not just the existence of these courses, but what was taught inside them. During raids, SEBI seized video recordings showing that across multiple programmes, Sathe and other instructors walked participants through complete trades, from selecting specific stocks to identifying entry prices. SEBI rules explicitly prohibit live trading or trade-specific guidance in educational courses. 

The violations did not stop there. Sathe was also found making direct market predictions during sessions and presenting his own mark-to-market gains as proof, while claiming his trades were “good for everyone”. SEBI noted evidence that students mirrored his trades in real time, executing the same positions simultaneously. This level of direct influence, especially from an unregistered individual, pushed the case beyond procedural violations and into territory that regulators believe may amount to potential fraud.

ASTA went all in on marketing its courses, and its most powerful pitch came in the form of student testimonials. Former participants appeared in videos describing extraordinary returns, often crediting their newfound success entirely to Avadhut Sathe’s teachings. These testimonials featured everyday individuals, homemakers, bankers, and people in regular salaried jobs, which made the claims feel relatable and trustworthy. On the surface, it seemed like the perfect shortcut to credibility. But SEBI’s findings suggest that the reality behind these stories was far less flattering.

After examining 5 publicly available testimonials on YouTube, SEBI found a stark mismatch between what was claimed and what actually happened. In the period highlighted in these videos, only 1 of 5 students had made any profit at all; the remaining 4 of 5 had suffered losses running into several lakhs. In other words, the advertised “supernormal returns” simply did not exist for most of the people showcased. SEBI viewed this as a clear case of misleading, and arguably fraudulent, advertising designed to lure new participants.

Looking beyond individual testimonials, the broader data paints an even bleaker picture. SEBI analysed the trading performance of 186 ex-students in the 6 months following the completion of their courses. Around 65 percent of them ended up losing money. Taken together, this group suffered a cumulative loss of roughly Rs. 1.9 crore. Far from discovering a winning formula, the numbers suggest that whatever was being taught did not consistently help participants navigate the market successfully.

Perhaps most damaging was what SEBI uncovered about Sathe’s own trading record. Over the past 2 years, his personal trading account showed cumulative losses exceeding Rs. 4 crore. His trading academy was also in the red, with losses of around Rs. 2 crore. Yet, these trading setbacks were more than offset by the fees collected from selling courses. Over the last decade, ASTA catered to more than 4.1 lakh participants and collected approximately Rs. 601 crore in course fees. Financially, the operation was highly profitable, but that success came largely at the expense of its students.

Some of these concerns were not entirely new. Nearly two years ago, based on early findings, SEBI had issued a warning to Avadhut Sathe, asking him to stop misrepresenting facts. His response was to claim that he was being unfairly targeted. Sathe argued that he could not be labelled a finfluencer since he did not directly monetise his YouTube or social media presence, and went on to describe himself as a “victim of a regulatory vacuum.” 

With the latest evidence now in the public domain, that defence appears increasingly weak. The case reads less like regulatory ambiguity and more like a belief that rules only matter once enforcement begins. SEBI’s order may now serve as a benchmark for action against similar unregistered advisory models operating in the shadows.

Conclusion

SEBI’s order against Avadhut Sathe is an interim measure, not a final verdict. While it does not yet carry criminal charges, the actions taken so far are stringent. Both Avadhut Sathe and his wife, Gouri Sathe, have been barred from dealing in securities individually, and they are prohibited from selling any of their assets for the time being. 

SEBI has also impounded over Rs. 546 crore from ASTA, categorising it as unlawful gains earned from selling unregistered investment advice. While the funds have not been fully seized, they have been placed in a fixed deposit under SEBI’s supervision, keeping them under close regulatory watch.

The interim nature of the order leaves room for further action. Some complaints are still under investigation, including one allegation that ASTA used a 12-year-old child in a promotional video, possibly implying that if even a child could trade successfully after their courses, so could any adult. Such tactics, if proven, could add weight to SEBI’s case in the future.

At a broader level, the Avadhut Sathe case exposes a regulatory grey zone in India’s capital markets. While SEBI clearly prohibits unregistered investment advice, the boundaries between financial education, marketing, and advisory services have historically been vague. 

Influencers like Sathe operated in this space, selling courses under the banner of education while effectively giving trade-specific guidance to students. Social media amplification, flashy testimonials, and marketing strategies further blurred the line between legal teaching and unregistered advisory. This case now serves as a cautionary tale and a precedent, signalling that SEBI is closing in on such grey areas, and that confidence and influence are no substitute for formal registration and compliance.

Disclaimer

The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on tradebrains.in are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Investing in equities poses a risk of financial losses. Investors must therefore exercise due caution while investing or trading in stocks. Trade Brains Technologies Private Limited or the author are not liable for any losses caused as a result of the decision based on this article. Please consult your investment advisor before investing.

The post Avadhut Sathe Case: How a Finfluencer’s Rise Exposed SEBI’s Grey Zone? appeared first on Trade Brains.